Course two of three · Antifragile Communication Design

Human-Centric and Neuroethical Design

What a design decision does to a nervous system, and what follows from that.

Four weeks48 contact hoursSeminar and reviewNo prerequisites — it starts from the ground

If every interface decision activates or suppresses a cognitive system, what is a designer responsible for?

01

The act

Design as a neurological decision, made daily, at scale, on an unconsenting population.

02

The person

What behavioural data cannot know. Vulnerability as a state anyone enters, not a category of person.

03

The line

Consent where there is no consent form, and what is now actionable rather than merely objectionable.

04

The review

Defend your verdict to a room arguing in good faith for the product you condemned.

Students leave with

A design review document on a real product
A verdict they can hold, or amend honestly
An account of what is actionable, not just wrong
  • A document, not an artifact. Judging is the skill being taught.
  • Finding a product defensible is worth as much as condemning it.

The most portable of the three. It needs a room, and nothing else.

Fifteen minutes on a call is usually enough. Syllabus in outcome-based format, facilitator's kit and student handbook on request — and it runs unchanged as professional training.

Aki Gato aki.gato.art@gmail.com

Suits design and HCI, product, psychology, media law and policy No equipment · no human subjects · no ethics review Works as a faculty-wide elective